Multi-Generational Backlash Targets Nancy Pelosi
Nancy Pelosi undermining Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s bid for chair of the House Oversight Committee resulted in broad backlash
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA-12) led a campaign against Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY-14) and her bid for a leadership position on the House Oversight Committee, according to a report by Punchbowl News. Within hours of Democrats voting 131 to 84 to grant the position to 74-year-old Gerry Connolly (D-VA-11) who is battling throat cancer, the backlash began.
“Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi is actively working to tank Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-N.Y.) bid to become the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee,” reported Punchbowl News.
Many have voiced their displeasure with 84-year-old Pelosi’s decision to back Connolly and not Ocasio-Cortez. When I posted about it on social media, I received hundreds of comments from people across several generations who hoped to see generational change in Democrat leadership.
Many commenters mentioned how lawmakers have profited from their positions in Congress to increase their wealth and highlighted how Pelosi stood against prohibiting members of Congress from trading stocks through various channels, such as alleged insider trading which isn’t technically legal for lawmakers. However, oversight is greatly lacking.
Some also discussed how age can be a factor in representing younger generations and how it plays into missing the mark on current social trends such as the high cost of living and data privacy. The lack of feeling represented is arguably one of the biggest contributing factors in people under 35 not turning out to vote in large numbers. As a 50-year-old, it’s a feeling I can attest to as I have never felt represented by any member of Congress who is decades older than I am.
While some argued that experience and knowledge are far superior to people of a younger age, an ageist mentality, others countered by saying that their experience should be used to mentor younger generations to prepare them to replace others who have been in Congress for decades.
I reached out to Pelosi’s office for comment. I have not received an on-the-record response but someone in Congress with knowledge of Pelosi’s career gave me a link to an Axios article suggesting Pelosi has been taking a “hands-off role” in these matters. That, however, does not seem to have an impact on the backlash seen across social media and various op-eds in many news outlets as voters believe she is still imposing her will on the party which the article described as ruling the Democratic caucus with an “iron fist”.
If you want to see hundreds more comments like those posted here you can find them on this TikTok video, this post on Threads, and this one on Substack. The multigenerational backlash is very real and I hope Democrats are paying attention. It’s incumbent upon them to listen to voters who are otherwise disenfranchised by the establishment politics of decades ago. Governing isn’t supposed to be comfortable. It’s a civic service that was never meant to make a career out of.
I’m a freelance journalist. Find my work at Latino Rebels, Unicorn Riot, The Antagonist Magazine, and more. I’m also on TikTok, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon, and Threads. To support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber or donate on Venmo, PayPal, or CashApp
Good deal but why now? Why was it ok to go treasure hunting for WMDs with the butchers of Baghdad? Or killing Medicare For All for Obama Care? Why not when she let Cory Bush and Jamal Bowman go down like Build Back Better? She’s had a long career as you note steeped in the kleptocratic politics that caused Democrats to leave living wages, rent insecurity, affordable housing, nutrition supplements, student debt, child poverty, and guaranteed basic income off this year’s election platform despite trailing in the polls for the whole year.
Anyone gonna talk about mandate limits at some point? Why can they be senators/representatives for life? Shouldn't it be limited to a certain number of times, like say 3 or 4 max? I'm being generous because I'd like to see one term only and one position only per life ... it's not like we're going to run out of people in a country with more than 300M people ...